This entry was posted
on Monday, March 8th, 2010 at 5:22 pm and is filed under architect.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
25 Responses to “Architect Richard Gage on Coast To Coast AM June 9, 2009 – Part 2”
“Its not obvious at all…” – it seems pretty obvious to me : there is quite a lot of convincing evidence demonstrated by ae911truth.
“the ‘official’ story does offer the only tangeable explanation…” – which official story are you referring to?
“The fact that it has been used to start a war is a political one…” – a political what?
“without at some point getting a whistle blower…” – this is a good question. Nice too. whistle blowers don’t save every bad situation tho unfortunately.
If this was planned by whoever on the inseide , just honestly imagine how they could have possibley have gone sitting in the meeting saying …”i know what we’ll do… and there is not need either for anything so elaborate.
“If you were responsible for the deaths of thousands ”
good point, but how is it possible to assemble such a team that would be happy to do this, without at some point getting a whistle blower that refused. There would be too many trails of evidence to hide.
To conceive of a plan like that would be ridiculous. whereas the ‘official’ story does offer the only tangeable explanation.
The fact that it has been used to start a war is a political one.
“After we beefed up on security or do they look for another trick play? ”
the shoe bomber, and the nuttter at Glasgow airport.. Islamists are always sacrificing themselves.
Its doubtful they will be able to now. But they could then, I hope we are correct anyhow.
If you run a trick play in football do you try the same exact play on the next down when the other team is looking for it? Do you really think that if they did do the plane thing that they would try the same thing again. After we beefed up on security or do they look for another trick play?
If you were responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans when 84% of those Americans are looking for you would you come forward. There are to many other theories about the planes to get into but in my opinion I think its deeper than the radical muslim thing.
If you are about to suicide bomb to kill people you would want to take out as many as possible and the leader. You would think go after the leader first and then you would think crash the planes into a nuclear power plant. That would possibly kill millions. A lot of demo experts are on the truth movements side. Are those demo experts not experts. Unconventional demo? Yes. Impossible demo? No. planes were a distraction and a “scapegoat” for building collapse. In my opinion.
What CREDIBLE source gave that theory? The mainstream media. Now finish the whole official story. 2 planes suicidaly piloted by radical muslim hijackers funded by Al Queda. We believed that without asking a single question. But eveything possibility to the contrary is met with a barage of questions and debunking. Try to debunk the official claim as hard as you try to debunk the truth movement and see how much easier it will be to do.
“Obviously enough, the buildings were demolished in a professional way,”
Its not obvious at all. Get the opinion of demolishion experts. It would take many people all would have to be kept silent.
“But why fly planes into the buildings too”
well that did happen we saw it, so I say why demolish them too , it is unecessary, and far to contrived.
Analyze the evidence that the official story gave you. Do you have any evidence? What credible sources support the events from the official side. If the truth movement threw a name out you would ask for more evidence but when they said terrorist you asked for no evidence. A headband and passport make it out of a pocket an airplane and a building. No questions. A paper with names of passengers. No questions for more evidence. WHY?
its not a belief in god its a belief in the devil. ITS A FACT. THE richest bankers in the world are satanists. make hitler{ who they financed} look like a school boy. they own the federal reserve. LITERALLY. they have names. Its the belief in God that is so dangerous. You side {unknowingly} with the enimy of the USA. You are a captive. How can i convince you ? The religion you speak of IS dangerous but as long as you speak the way you do you wil get along well with the satanists.
So glad we can here architectsengineers opinions now. Been waiting for this.
Obviously enough, the buildings were demolished in a professional way, with extensive organization, and it seems like a lot of equipment had to be brought in and set up for such successful demolitions.
So whatever about who is responsible, I cant speculate about that. Altho there are lots of interesting theories.
But why fly planes into the buildings too, & cause more confusion? Its like the punchline of a (sick) joke.
pilots wi chargesth 30yrs exp couldnt hit those buildings no matter how hard they tried in simulation it was laser guided by the military planes doing so called terrorist exercises. and those massive steel risers cut on a 45 where cut with thermite charges on other floors also. drop a bldg 10 ft and u will get that fall affect i used to cut the steel plants down back in the 80s
for security reasons i’m sure they did not tell the hole story on the nightly news, and thats a good thing !! this has not happened again, and it’s not because we cant take shampoo on our air plains . it’s because we fixed some weaknesses a few religious fucks found but they are dead now. i think we need to focus on how dangerous religion and the belief in god is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Never mind that firefighters knew hours in advance that WTC 7 was coming down because it was LEANING. watch?v=3HLDgjYuRHk Never mind that there are photos and videos available that show the towers failing by progressive buckling. forums[dot]randi[dot]org/showthread[dot]php?p=4948962
Actually The building collapsed from the floors the planes flew in .! The floors above were intack for a short while.
The 45 degree columns phots were taken after the clear up operation..
responders said the metal was steel how would they know that. ?
![[del.icio.us]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[Friendsite]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/friendsite.png)
![[Furl]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/furl.png)
![[Google]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/google.png)
![[Mister Wong]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/misterwong.png)
![[Mixx]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/mixx.png)
![[MySpace]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[Spurl]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/spurl.png)
![[Squidoo]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/squidoo.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Technorati]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Twitter]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Windows Live]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/windowslive.png)
![[Yahoo!]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/yahoo.png)
![[Email]](http://www.cre3design.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)
“which official story are you referring to?
”
the one that says islamic terroists commited suicide flying planes into buildings.
Give me an alternative scenario of how they flew into those building.!
“evidence demonstrated by ae911truth.
”
what evidence . There is none.
“Its not obvious at all…” – it seems pretty obvious to me : there is quite a lot of convincing evidence demonstrated by ae911truth.
“the ‘official’ story does offer the only tangeable explanation…” – which official story are you referring to?
“The fact that it has been used to start a war is a political one…” – a political what?
“without at some point getting a whistle blower…” – this is a good question. Nice too. whistle blowers don’t save every bad situation tho unfortunately.
“If you are about to suicide bomb to kill people you would want to take out as many as possible and the leader”
they don’t seem to work like that, you and I have minds not like such folk. They attack aircraft, ( pan am) buildings, airports, trains etc)
“Tangible? Or first explanation? ”
tangable.. One might invoke occums whatsit.
If this was planned by whoever on the inseide , just honestly imagine how they could have possibley have gone sitting in the meeting saying …”i know what we’ll do… and there is not need either for anything so elaborate.
Tangible? Or first explanation?
“If you were responsible for the deaths of thousands ”
good point, but how is it possible to assemble such a team that would be happy to do this, without at some point getting a whistle blower that refused. There would be too many trails of evidence to hide.
To conceive of a plan like that would be ridiculous. whereas the ‘official’ story does offer the only tangeable explanation.
The fact that it has been used to start a war is a political one.
“After we beefed up on security or do they look for another trick play? ”
the shoe bomber, and the nuttter at Glasgow airport.. Islamists are always sacrificing themselves.
Its doubtful they will be able to now. But they could then, I hope we are correct anyhow.
If you run a trick play in football do you try the same exact play on the next down when the other team is looking for it? Do you really think that if they did do the plane thing that they would try the same thing again. After we beefed up on security or do they look for another trick play?
If you were responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans when 84% of those Americans are looking for you would you come forward. There are to many other theories about the planes to get into but in my opinion I think its deeper than the radical muslim thing.
“Unconventional demo? Yes”
not one person involved in it, supplier of equipment or anyone who would have been involved has EVER come forward.
“2 planes suicidaly piloted by radical muslim hijackers funded by Al Queda. ”
yup, who have been caught attempting similar since..
Alternative… planes hit the buildings how….?
If you are about to suicide bomb to kill people you would want to take out as many as possible and the leader. You would think go after the leader first and then you would think crash the planes into a nuclear power plant. That would possibly kill millions. A lot of demo experts are on the truth movements side. Are those demo experts not experts. Unconventional demo? Yes. Impossible demo? No. planes were a distraction and a “scapegoat” for building collapse. In my opinion.
What CREDIBLE source gave that theory? The mainstream media. Now finish the whole official story. 2 planes suicidaly piloted by radical muslim hijackers funded by Al Queda. We believed that without asking a single question. But eveything possibility to the contrary is met with a barage of questions and debunking. Try to debunk the official claim as hard as you try to debunk the truth movement and see how much easier it will be to do.
“What credible sources support the events from the official side.”
Officially 2 planes were suicidaly PILOTED into those buildings.
please give alternatie scenario.?
“Obviously enough, the buildings were demolished in a professional way,”
Its not obvious at all. Get the opinion of demolishion experts. It would take many people all would have to be kept silent.
“But why fly planes into the buildings too”
well that did happen we saw it, so I say why demolish them too , it is unecessary, and far to contrived.
Analyze the evidence that the official story gave you. Do you have any evidence? What credible sources support the events from the official side. If the truth movement threw a name out you would ask for more evidence but when they said terrorist you asked for no evidence. A headband and passport make it out of a pocket an airplane and a building. No questions. A paper with names of passengers. No questions for more evidence. WHY?
its not a belief in god its a belief in the devil. ITS A FACT. THE richest bankers in the world are satanists. make hitler{ who they financed} look like a school boy. they own the federal reserve. LITERALLY. they have names. Its the belief in God that is so dangerous. You side {unknowingly} with the enimy of the USA. You are a captive. How can i convince you ? The religion you speak of IS dangerous but as long as you speak the way you do you wil get along well with the satanists.
yeah god sucks, but wake up man.
So glad we can here architectsengineers opinions now. Been waiting for this.
Obviously enough, the buildings were demolished in a professional way, with extensive organization, and it seems like a lot of equipment had to be brought in and set up for such successful demolitions.
So whatever about who is responsible, I cant speculate about that. Altho there are lots of interesting theories.
But why fly planes into the buildings too, & cause more confusion? Its like the punchline of a (sick) joke.
pilots wi chargesth 30yrs exp couldnt hit those buildings no matter how hard they tried in simulation it was laser guided by the military planes doing so called terrorist exercises. and those massive steel risers cut on a 45 where cut with thermite charges on other floors also. drop a bldg 10 ft and u will get that fall affect i used to cut the steel plants down back in the 80s
for security reasons i’m sure they did not tell the hole story on the nightly news, and thats a good thing !! this has not happened again, and it’s not because we cant take shampoo on our air plains . it’s because we fixed some weaknesses a few religious fucks found but they are dead now. i think we need to focus on how dangerous religion and the belief in god is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Never mind that firefighters knew hours in advance that WTC 7 was coming down because it was LEANING. watch?v=3HLDgjYuRHk Never mind that there are photos and videos available that show the towers failing by progressive buckling. forums[dot]randi[dot]org/showthread[dot]php?p=4948962
Actually The building collapsed from the floors the planes flew in .! The floors above were intack for a short while.
The 45 degree columns phots were taken after the clear up operation..
responders said the metal was steel how would they know that. ?
9/11 was an inside job!!!